BGonline.org Forums

Not many options but still tricky.

Posted By: Neil Robins
Date: Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 8:36 p.m.

In Response To: Not many options but still tricky. (christian munk-christensen)

Of the hitting numbers I'd feel 13/12 6/4* holding the prime looks slightly better than 6/4* 5/4 and 10/9 6/4* costs too much on 63. 13/10 is possible too, but I don't much like it at this score because I'd feel getting the opponent off the 4-pt now should win more gammons and if we are heading into an ace point game another checker or two back is fine. So 13/12 6/4* for me.

Messages In This Thread

• Not many options but still tricky.
  christian munk-christensen -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 4:31 p.m.
  • Not many options but still tricky.
    Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 5:40 p.m.
    • Not many options but still tricky.
      Alejandro -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 8:26 p.m.
      • Not many options but still tricky.
        Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 9:38 p.m.
        • Not many options but still tricky.
          Stick -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Not many options but still tricky.
    Stick -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 8:33 p.m.
  • Not many options but still tricky.
    Neil Robins -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 8:36 p.m.
  • Not many options but still tricky.
    Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 27 May 2010, at 11:15 p.m.
  • Not many options but still tricky.
    christian munk-christensen -- Friday, 28 May 2010, at 5:19 p.m.
    • You didnt roll out the play I thought was slightly best
      neilkaz -- Friday, 28 May 2010, at 7:22 p.m.
      • Long XG 3 ply RO
        neilkaz -- Friday, 28 May 2010, at 11:14 p.m.
        • Long XG 3 ply RO
          christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 29 May 2010, at 9:14 a.m.
  • Not many options but still tricky.
    Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 29 May 2010, at 11:44 p.m.