| |
BGonline.org Forums
Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-3-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
Posted By: Petter Bengtsson In Response To: Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-3-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf (Daniel Murphy)
Date: Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 6:54 p.m.
But Petter, suggest another also good White prime position that might make a difference, and I'll roll it out too.
Start from this position:
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 1061 point match pip: 96
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-BBBBBCa-a--b------cbbbbB-:0:0:-1:62:0:0:0:1:10 to play 62
1. XG Roller+ 13/5 eq: +0,666
Player:
Opponent:83,31% (G:19,22% B:0,55%)
16,69% (G:3,20% B:0,09%)2. XG Roller+ 18/12 16/14 eq: +0,659 (-0,007)
Player:
Opponent:82,97% (G:17,12% B:0,51%)
17,03% (G:3,60% B:0,07%)3. XG Roller+ 18/10 eq: +0,651 (-0,015)
Player:
Opponent:82,55% (G:16,81% B:0,50%)
17,45% (G:3,77% B:0,07%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.14, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
Yellow's next rolls:
66 24/18(2)*
32 12/9*/7*
31 7/4 12/11
31 ?
And you reach a position that I think is more likely to occur than three on the bar combined with a closed board.
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 1261 point match pip: 63
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=cBBBCBC----A-------ccbbb--:0:0:1:31:0:0:0:1:10 to play 31
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.14
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.