[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Balls

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Saturday, 12 June 2010, at 11:20 a.m.

In Response To: Balls (Ray Kershaw)

As UBK pointed out you need at least the following implicit assumptions (if not a few others):

Y knows that X can see Y & Z's ball but not his own, is truthful, and reasons perfectly. Z knows all that and also knows the same things about Y.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.