| |
BGonline.org Forums
XG question: Double point at -2,-2
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: XG question: Double point at -2,-2 (Bob Koca)
Date: Wednesday, 7 July 2010, at 4:55 p.m.
Point 1 is fine. Point 2 is fine. For point 3 becoming too good means the market for having a cube accepted has been lost so I disagree this is a valid example. For point 4 how do you know the equities are exactly the same?
Thanks for the clarification. I never said I considered my "test position" to be a valid example; for 3 that's the answer I was expecting but I thought I'd check anyway. For 4, I only know that the equities are within .0005; I'll assume (from your re-question) that that is insufficient.
I was just having fun overcomplicating; I now think (unless you refute the concept) that I was on the right track here. It's just a matter of minor alteration to give O a proper cube after X rolls his doublet (which it seems Matt has aubsequently accomplished with XG).
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.