| |
BGonline.org Forums
Verifying Randomness
Posted By: Casper van der Tak In Response To: Verifying Randomness (Steve Mellen)
Date: Thursday, 12 August 2010, at 8:16 a.m.
Evidence, but not conclusive proof. You cannot have conclusive proof one way or the other I think, and expecting to be corrected by someone smart if wrong.
I think this sometimes end up as a kind of unpractical word play; in Timothy's example, you cannot proof that the demon is not producing random numbers, but if someone would wish to bet the next number is a 9, what odds would you give?
All "you's" same at the French "on" or Dutch "men", BTW.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.