BGonline.org Forums

Where in this Succession of Positions Was I Supposed to Redouble?

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Monday, 16 August 2010, at 3:33 p.m.

In Response To: Where in this Succession of Positions Was I Supposed to Redouble? (Paul Weaver)

Did he whine a bit to make you even happier?

Position 1: No double

Position 2: No double. I think you lose your market on making the 5, dance, but not making the 5 is bad, and making the 5 followed by entry is also bad.

Position 3: No double, as soon as Chocolate enters he becomes very threatening, and a lot of time before Blonde has come around the board.

Position 4: I think the burned builder hurts, so would not double. Not sure. Would double if the checker on the 2 was, say, on the 6 (also not sure).

Position 5: ?

Position 6: Double, unsure about the take

Position 7: Double, drop.

The 55 I'd play 18/13(2) 18/8.

I think with a centered cube positions 3 and 4 become doubles.

Messages In This Thread

• Where in this Succession of Positions Was I Supposed to Redouble?
  Paul Weaver -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 2:06 p.m.
  • Where in this Succession of Positions Was I Supposed to Redouble?
    christian munk-christensen -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 3:00 p.m.
  • Where in this Succession of Positions Was I Supposed to Redouble?
    Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 3:33 p.m.
    • What did the masochist do to the sadist?
      Paul Weaver -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 4:44 p.m.
      • What did the masochist do to the sadist?
        Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 5:10 p.m.
      • What did the masochist do to the sadist?
        Steve Mellen -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 7:06 p.m.
  • Rollout Results Posted
    Paul Weaver -- Monday, 16 August 2010, at 9:29 p.m.