BGonline.org Forums

Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Monday, 23 August 2010, at 4:45 p.m.

In Response To: Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited (Timothy Chow)

Yes, you are right in that. The original position's analysis should also take the spare location (and possibly some other things) into account, and did not, and it would be easy to take incomplete lessons from the original analysis. The swing in the result surprises me actually.

Messages In This Thread

• Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
  Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 2:03 p.m.
  • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
    Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 2:33 p.m.
  • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
    Keene -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 3:41 p.m.
    • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 4:12 p.m.
      • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
        Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 4:45 p.m.
      • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
        Keene -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 9:06 p.m.
        • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 9:56 p.m.
  • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 5:29 p.m.
    • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 8:20 p.m.
  • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
    Keene -- Monday, 23 August 2010, at 9:09 p.m.
  • Phil Simborg's 5-5 revisited
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 30 September 2010, at 1:06 a.m.