[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

52S-52D-42@-54 at -4-2

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Wednesday, 25 August 2010, at 8:11 p.m.

In Response To: 52S-52D-42@-54C-53 (Casper van der Tak)

52S-52D-42@-54 at -4-2


 ' ' ' '2O5X '4X ' '1X4O

2X ' ' ' '5O '4O ' ' '3X


But is the play correct? Should it not be something more adventurous at the score?

Dunno, hadn't thought about it. As long as the Nactation is correct... :)

For money or almost any other score, it looks like John's (White's) chosen C (Cross, 24/20 11/6) would have been clear.

At John's actual score of -4-2 (or at GG), he might have tried o (outer, 11/7 8/3) or c (cross, 24/20 8/3) or R (Run, 24/15) or maybe you have some other swashbuckling move in mind, but I doubt his (admittedly stodgy) C play can be far wrong (if wrong at all) even at the score.

C surely wins the most games, so for it to be right to make some other play (which is possible) John would presumably have to generate a lot of gammons by virtue of (a) tempting Gregg off the anchor with 20/14* (so that he doesn't get blocked by a covered 11pt or 7pt) -- a tightrope strategy because Gregg can choose not to hit, and/or (b) slotting his board to build it faster at the expense of exposing a shot with poor immediate tactical counterplay and/or failing to set his own back checkers in motion.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.