| |
BGonline.org Forums
Analysis
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: A good example (Chuck Bower)
Date: Wednesday, 27 October 2010, at 12:29 a.m.
Assumptions: 40% success rate on 2-pt conversion for college. (It's 47% in pros, but they get the ball at the 2 yardline whereas college gets it at the 3.) 17% chance to recover a 'telegraphed' onside kick. Equal chances in OT after accounting for homefield effects.
0) (6:06 remain, OK trails by 9 with PAT decision on the line; 2 TO's remain.) (Oklahoma) Attempting 2 better than attempting 1 by 0.06% GWC (j.s.d. = 0.014% GWC). (From now on, all units are GWC so I won't explicitly state the units.) CORRECT
1) (Oklahoma) normal KO better by 0.17% (j.s.d. = 0.036%). WRONG
2a) (Missouri) goes for 1st down at opp's 45 yardline with 4:40 remaining -- OK has zero timeouts left: Go better than punt by 0.25% (j.s.d. = 0.02%) CORRECT
2b) (Missouri) punts at opp's 35 yardline with 2:46 on clock facing 4th and 2: Going for 1st down better by 0.4% (j.s.d. 0.02%). WRONG
3) (Oklahoma) punts at own 7 w/2:24 on clock facing 4th and 10: going for 1st down better by 0.8% (j.s.d. 0.01%). WRONG
Summary:
A) the play that was discussed ad infinitum is by far the least important of these five situations.
B) of the five plays, they got 2 right -- the 3rd and 5th most important (in terms of GWC equity at stake).
C) the biggest error of the five was a white flag waving, i.e. concession of a loss, probably a 'political' decision to influence Bowl committees and/or BCS voters. In fact, a megawhopping 80% of available equity was sacrificed by punting. Hope OK enjoys that extra $100k they get for upping their bowl invitation most of the time (while jettisoning some of their chances for playing for a national championship). (Sarcasm intended.)
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.