BGonline.org Forums

Adjusted match equity

Posted By: Fabrice Liardet
Date: Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 3:34 p.m.

In Response To: Adjusted match equity (Dimitar Draganov)

Not enough info I am afraid. The better player will have a lot more chances at -8,-5 than at -2,-1 Crawford, although the MET says 32% in both cases.

Nevertheless, if someone has some adjusting heuristics that don't require to learn a whole table for each rating difference, I am interested. I remember having once or twice tried a simple approximation OTB for calculating some post-Crawford equity when contemplating a leader cube at -2,-n.

Messages In This Thread

• Adjusted match equity
  Dimitar Draganov -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 1:30 p.m.
  • Adjusted match equity
    Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 3:34 p.m.
    • Adjusted match equity
      Dimitar Draganov -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 4:01 p.m.
      • Adjusted match equity
        Fabrice Liardet -- Thursday, 18 November 2010, at 8:55 a.m.
  • Adjusted match equity
    Petter Bengtsson -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 4:45 p.m.
    • Adjusted match equity
      higonefive -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 5:00 p.m.
    • Adjusted match equity
      Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 18 November 2010, at 2:02 p.m.
      • Adjusted match equity
        Maik Stiebler -- Friday, 19 November 2010, at 11:16 p.m.
  • Adjusted match equity
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 6:05 p.m.
    • Adjusted match equity
      Dimitar Draganov -- Tuesday, 16 November 2010, at 7:13 p.m.
    • Adjusted match equity
      Fabrice Liardet -- Thursday, 18 November 2010, at 8:58 a.m.
  • Adjusted match equity
    Fabrice Liardet -- Thursday, 18 November 2010, at 2:52 p.m.