BGonline.org Forums

Criteria for extensions

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Wednesday, 22 December 2010, at 5:04 a.m.

In Response To: 62S-53 ^10 RO (Stick)

I concur.

While nothing is set in stone, here are some criteria for extensions. If people want to roll plays more trials than that, I'm delighted.

In my closing paragraph of that post, I said:

"...I leave it up to the original roller which plays they want to include and how far to extend them. It's nice to more or less "get it right" the first time, but it is always possible to request the files and extend them later."

I need to modify that statement. Evidently, not everyone has been e-mailing their completed rollout files to Stick (checkmugged@yahoo.com) -- or to David or to Nack who can forward them. As a consequence, files are scattered, making it harder to obtain a file for extension or added plays later (and to avoid redundant extensions/additions). That makes it more important to achieve an ample number of trials in the original effort.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 62S-53 ^10 RO
  mtuhtan -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 10:59 p.m.
  • 64R-43 started *NM*
    mtuhtan -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 11:04 p.m.
    • Noted, Thx *NM*
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 11:17 p.m.
  • 62S-53 ^10 RO
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 11:16 p.m.
    • 62S-53 ^10 RO
      mtuhtan -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 11:29 p.m.
  • 62S-53 ^10 RO
    Stick -- Wednesday, 22 December 2010, at 1:15 a.m.
    • Criteria for extensions
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 22 December 2010, at 5:04 a.m.
    • 62S-53 ^10 RO
      Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 22 December 2010, at 4:29 p.m.
  • 62S-53 ^20 RO
    mtuhtan -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 10:02 p.m.
    • 52D-54 started (by Miran) *NM*
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 24 December 2010, at 12:10 a.m.
    • 21S-53, 32S-53 and 62S-53
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 24 December 2010, at 12:38 a.m.