| |
BGonline.org Forums
Containment: Might 7-ply outperform XGR+?
Posted By: Stick In Response To: Containment: Might 7-ply outperform XGR+? (Rich Munitz)
Date: Saturday, 22 January 2011, at 10:40 p.m.
You're using a lot of foreign words that mean nothing to me like algorithm, statistical sampling, and in general words that are too many syllables for me to understand like 'computationally impractical to enumerate'. That wears me out just reading it.
Even though I'm linguistically challenged I understood that you think a 7 ply analysis would be clearly stronger in most all situations compared to XGR+. XGR+ is a variance reduced truncated at 7 ply rollout. I forget how many trials, I seem to remember somewhere along the lines of 600(?) but I can't quickly find the information to quote it exactly. 7 ply is... well, 7 ply lol. I don't know how else to say it and I could be dead wrong but what you're saying seems wrong to me.
Take the Depreli study for example. XGR+ crushes 5 ply across the board.
Stick
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.