BGonline.org Forums

Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception

Posted By: Leonardo Jerkovic
Date: Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 5:14 p.m.

In Response To: Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception (Phil Simborg)

I dont necessarily think money prizes mean gambling. Money prizes + trophies and points, ratings.

Take for example other games. You have variety of entry fees.- and variety of sponsor added money.

Local, regional tournaments must offer low-cost entry fees. Dont wait for ABT TD's to run those tourneys- local clubs can unite (under federation) and together form some sort of pyramid-style competitions.

Messages In This Thread

• Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
  Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:24 p.m.
  • Touché! *NM*
    higonefive -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:45 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:46 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 5:14 p.m.
  • ironically...
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 6:54 p.m.
  • An Interesting Question and Answer
    Michael Petch -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 11:46 p.m.
    • An Interesting Question and Answer - From Phil's site
      Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 12:14 a.m.
      • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:02 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:34 a.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:03 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing? Answer: More local clubs are needed.
          Ken Larsen -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:01 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          misja -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:07 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:11 p.m.
            • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
              Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:36 p.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Bill Riles -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:04 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:35 p.m.
                  • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                    Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
                    • +1 +1 and +1
                      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:43 p.m.
                • +1 *NM*
                  Justin N. -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 12:47 a.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:58 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            jdg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 6:00 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 8:16 p.m.