BGonline.org Forums

An Interesting Question and Answer

Posted By: Michael Petch
Date: Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 11:46 p.m.

In Response To: Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception (Phil Simborg)

"Interview With The Backgammon Player Phil Simborg" on backgammon.org:

Q: "What were your first impressions on the game and how do you compare Backgammon to other games and life for that matter?"

A: "What first excited me about backgammon was the fun of gambling. I’d never experienced anything as much fun and as exciting as the doubling cube. In fact, some friends of mine and I have incorporated the use of the doubling cube in other games, such as gin rummy, golf, and pool. It’s truly a wicked tool that makes the game so exciting."

Q: "Do you think Backgammon is increasing in popularity? Do you believe it could ever reach the level of popularity that it enjoyed in the 1970s? What do you think it will take to attract more people to the game?"

A: "Backgammon is clearly growing and on the upward movement, and I am sure it will get bigger and bigger. I know this because I have played so many other games and sports including Bridge, Poker, Gin, Chess, Scrabble, etc. etc. Backgammon has to become more popular simply because it is so much fun and such a great gambling game…the same two reasons poker has become so popular."

From http://www.backgammon.org/articles/interviewbackgammonplayerphilsimborg/ for the full context.

Messages In This Thread

• Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
  Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:24 p.m.
  • Touché! *NM*
    higonefive -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:45 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:46 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 5:14 p.m.
  • ironically...
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 6:54 p.m.
  • An Interesting Question and Answer
    Michael Petch -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 11:46 p.m.
    • An Interesting Question and Answer - From Phil's site
      Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 12:14 a.m.
      • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:02 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:34 a.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:03 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing? Answer: More local clubs are needed.
          Ken Larsen -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:01 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          misja -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:07 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:11 p.m.
            • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
              Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:36 p.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Bill Riles -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:04 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:35 p.m.
                  • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                    Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
                    • +1 +1 and +1
                      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:43 p.m.
                • +1 *NM*
                  Justin N. -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 12:47 a.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:58 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            jdg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 6:00 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 8:16 p.m.