BGonline.org Forums

An Interesting Question and Answer - From Phil's site

Posted By: Michael Petch
Date: Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 12:14 a.m.

In Response To: An Interesting Question and Answer (Michael Petch)

On Phil's site there is this comment:

"I have to add a word here about the negatives. What is wrong with children learning backgammon? Why don’t all parents encourage and teach their children to play? About the only *MAJOR NEGATIVE* I can think of is that *MANY PARENTS ASSOCIATE BACKGAMMON WITH GAMBLING*, and they don’t want to expose their children to tournaments and web sites that focus on the money and gambling aspects of the game. "

You suggest MANY parents, and must be enough for you to be concerned about the perception as well. If it wasn't a big deal it wouldn't be a major negative.

In fact this commentary on your site - I am in complete agreement with.

Messages In This Thread

• Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
  Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:24 p.m.
  • Touché! *NM*
    higonefive -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:45 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:46 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 5:14 p.m.
  • ironically...
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 6:54 p.m.
  • An Interesting Question and Answer
    Michael Petch -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 11:46 p.m.
    • An Interesting Question and Answer - From Phil's site
      Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 12:14 a.m.
      • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:02 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:34 a.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:03 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing? Answer: More local clubs are needed.
          Ken Larsen -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:01 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          misja -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:07 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:11 p.m.
            • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
              Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:36 p.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Bill Riles -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:04 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:35 p.m.
                  • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                    Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
                    • +1 +1 and +1
                      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:43 p.m.
                • +1 *NM*
                  Justin N. -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 12:47 a.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:58 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            jdg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 6:00 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 8:16 p.m.