BGonline.org Forums

Opening 32 XGR+ RO

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 11:09 a.m.

In Response To: Opening 32 XGR+ RO (neilkaz)

Thanks for the clarification.

FYI, 32D-51 is [$ S3]a, and 32D-32 is [Z=D]a, where "a" means an aggregate of bot values. Based on the best information we have then, the S/D margin of the XG2 R+ rollout result should be adjusted (slightly) from .0132 to .0134.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Opening 32 XGR+ RO
  neilkaz -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 1:43 a.m.
  • Opening 32 XGR+ RO
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 3:18 a.m.
    • Opening 32 XGR+ RO
      neilkaz -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 6:26 a.m.
      • Opening 32 XGR+ RO
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 11:09 a.m.
    • Opening 32 XGR+ RO
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 4:21 a.m.
      • Opening 32 XGR+ RO
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 6:21 a.m.
  • Opening 32 XGR+ RO/43XGR+RO compared with prime field theory.
    higonefive -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 11:17 a.m.
    • Opening 32 XGR+ RO/43XGR+RO compared with prime field theory.
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 7:16 p.m.
  • Inefficiency of 10pt builder
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 7:02 p.m.