BGonline.org Forums
OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Posted By: christian munk-christensen
Date: Saturday, 18 June 2011, at 6:32 a.m.
In Response To: OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long) (Bob Glass)
Not true that Federer didn't have to compete against strong players in the early parts of his career.
Federer has played Sampras and Agassi when they were really strong.
Messages In This Thread
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Stick -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 8:29 a.m.
- Agree fully
Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 9:06 a.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Joe Russell -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 9:52 a.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 12:45 p.m.
- Yes, he's the best
Sam Pottle -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 2:42 p.m.
- age and tennis (men's) slam titlests - OT
Chuck Bower -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 3:10 p.m.
- I agree but
adambulldog -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 3:22 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Steve Mellen -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 4:03 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
rew -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 11:21 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Frank Frigo -- Sunday, 12 June 2011, at 12:56 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Henrik Bukkjaer -- Monday, 13 June 2011, at 9:09 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Bob Koca -- Friday, 17 June 2011, at 6:29 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Bob Koca -- Monday, 20 June 2011, at 9:21 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.