BGonline.org Forums
OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Posted By: Christian Munk-Christensen
Date: Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 6:57 a.m.
In Response To: OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long) (Stick)
Is it better to "own" than to "dominate"?
I'd say that Nadal was/is more sure of winning clay tournaments than Federer is sure of winning on the other surfaces.
Messages In This Thread
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Stick -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 8:29 a.m.
- Agree fully
Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 9:06 a.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Joe Russell -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 9:52 a.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 12:45 p.m.
- Yes, he's the best
Sam Pottle -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 2:42 p.m.
- age and tennis (men's) slam titlests - OT
Chuck Bower -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 3:10 p.m.
- I agree but
adambulldog -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 3:22 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Steve Mellen -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 4:03 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
rew -- Friday, 10 June 2011, at 11:21 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Frank Frigo -- Sunday, 12 June 2011, at 12:56 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Henrik Bukkjaer -- Monday, 13 June 2011, at 9:09 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Bob Koca -- Friday, 17 June 2011, at 6:29 p.m.
- OT - Tennis - Why Federer is the best (long)
Bob Koca -- Monday, 20 June 2011, at 9:21 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.