|
BGonline.org Forums
Do I misunderstand gammon price?
Posted By: Jeremy Bagai
Date: Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 5:27 p.m.
White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 797 point match pip: 40
score: 0
Blue is Player 1XGID=aCCCCB-----------d----ebc-:2:1:1:54:0:0:0:7:10 Blue to play 54
1. Rollout1 5/Off 4/Off eq: +1.168
Player:
Opponent:94.29% (G:19.49% B:0.15%)
5.71% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)Conf.: ± 0.001 (+1.167...+1.170) - [100.0%]
Duration: 25.1 seconds2. Rollout1 5/1 5/Off eq: +1.123 (-0.045)
Player:
Opponent:99.62% (G:13.63% B:0.10%)
0.38% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)Conf.: ± 0.001 (+1.122...+1.124) - [0.0%]
Duration: 9.2 seconds1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG RollereXtreme Gammon Version: 2.01, MET: Kazaross XG2
XG says we should make the big play for the gammon. But I don't understand the numbers:
The big play wins 5.86 more gammons (19.49 - 13.63) but loses 5.33 more games (99.62 - 94.29).
For money you must win two extra gammons for each new game lost, and at this score your gammon price is slightly worse than for moeny. Using XG2, a plain win takes you to 76.21%, a gammon takes you to 100% (for a gain of 23.79%), and a plain loss takes you to 23.79% (for a loss of 52.42%).
23.79% / 52.42 = a gammon price of .4538, which is what XG reports in the cube info panel.
So if the gammon price is less than for money, and you win only slightly more new gammons than you lose new games, why does XG like the big play?
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.