                        | |||
| Bot | Seed | Equity | Nacbracs | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XG 2.10 XGR++ Eval | [XGR++ seed] | +39.5 | [Z $19 r30 R32 z39 S46 %69 U74] "&e | Taper_Mike |
| XG 2.10 XGR++ Eval | [XGR++ seed] | +40.8 | n[Z $21 R36 r37 z39 S47 %69 U80] "&e | Taper_Mike |
Key: $ = Slot [13/5], % = Alternate slot = D = Down [13/11, 13/7], R = Run [23/15], r = run [24/16], S = Split [24/18, 13/11], U = Up = 24/18, 23/21, Z = Reverse split [23/21, 13/7], z = reverse split [24/22, 13/7]
Nactation Tutorial Explanation of nacbracs
There is an error in the last paragraph of Nacks post. The nacbracs given there are for a regular money rollout. The data, however, match the -n (no Jacoby, no beavers) rollout above. The only change needed is to add n as a prefix to the nacbracs:
n[Z $21 R36 r37 z39 S47 %69 U80] "&e
Nacks diagram at the end of his post is for no Jacoby, Beavers. A punctilious correction would include erasing the word Beavers. Alternatively, you could use b instead of n as a prefix for the nacbracs.
| Mneumonic | Suffix | Jacoby Rule Enforced | Beavers Allowed | Jacoby/Beaver Field in XGID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Money | none, or -m | yes | yes | 3 |
| No Jacoby, No Beavers | -n | | | 0 |
| Beavers | -b | | yes | 2 |
| Jacoby | -j | yes | | 1 |
Another small error appears in the penultimate paragraph. There, the final nacbracs is given as [Z S13 R33 $33 %63 U68] "&e. Because it is a regular money eval, it is correct to omit the prefix for this one. The error is for S. It should be S14. The complete nacbracs should be:
[Z S14 R33 $33 %63 U68] "&e
@Stick: If you make these corrections, please delete this post when you are done. Thanks.
Mike