"In both cases I believe the blitzing play doesn't reap the full benefit of the gammons due to the centered cube"
I should point out that my RO was done without Jacoby rule. Jacoby rule pushes the difference even further to about .039
1. | Rollout1 | 24/18(2) 13/7*(2) | eq: +0.929 |
| Player: Opponent: | 71.26% (G:21.62% B:0.91%) 28.74% (G:5.07% B:0.17%) | Conf.: ± 0.009 (+0.920...+0.938) - [100.0%] Duration: 1 minute 45 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 13/7*(2) 7/1*(2) | eq: +0.890 (-0.039) |
| Player: Opponent: | 68.78% (G:41.23% B:1.40%) 31.22% (G:6.76% B:0.32%) | Conf.: ± 0.010 (+0.881...+0.900) - [0.0%] Duration: 1 minute 04 seconds |
|
3. | 3-ply | 24/18 13/7*(3) | eq: +0.796 (-0.134) |
| Player: Opponent: | 66.62% (G:27.45% B:1.76%) 33.38% (G:7.11% B:0.27%) | |
|
4. | 2-ply | 13/7*(2) 8/2(2) | eq: +0.746 (-0.183) |
| Player: Opponent: | 65.11% (G:30.45% B:1.74%) 34.89% (G:7.84% B:0.34%) | |
|
5. | 2-ply | 13/7*(3) 7/1* | eq: +0.693 (-0.236) |
| Player: Opponent: | 64.06% (G:31.91% B:1.51%) 35.94% (G:8.60% B:0.46%) | |
|
|
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|