[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Another !@*& snake-eyes that I had no clue about (no, that's not nactation)

Posted By: Robert Chow
Date: Sunday, 8 June 2014, at 6:23 p.m.

In Response To: Another !@*& snake-eyes that I had no clue about (no, that's not nactation) (Timothy Chow)

I would play 6/5(2) 11/9. This keeps maximum building potential for the bar point and it may be useful to make the 9 point. 11/9 does give White extra shots but if hit on the 9 point, I have many unduplicated re-hits, 4's and 6's, from the bar.

Moving up with the back checker to the 22 point, 24/22, seems wrong as it allows White to attack with 3's, 4's and 5's, the numbers which White cannot play on the other side of the board.

24/23 with 11/10 plays against 32 by White since he will leave a direct shot if he makes his 5 point. However, I don't want to be pointed upon with numbers such as 54 44 or 22.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.