|
BGonline.org Forums
Advanced Backgammon #155
Posted By: Keene In Response To: Advanced Backgammon #155 (Igor)
Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2014, at 2:09 a.m.
I wonder whether it's a technical double/beaver. On so many non-6s it's so bad for blue.
For the sake of argument, I'll call it d/t. Take is easy, IMO. Double is marginal, at best. White has very good spares on a miss for one turn only, so I think it's really a case of counting how many bad non 6s there are. By my reckoning it's about 10, depending on how you feel about 43 and 42, so probably half of the misses are Rd/t, half rd/p.
K
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.