BGonline.org Forums

3a6a cube decision

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Tuesday, 3 March 2015, at 5:10 a.m.

In Response To: 3a6a cube decision (Stick)

Yes. The main reason is that there is no option to play small numbers behind the anchor. For example when get down to two checkers to clear 21, 31, 41 also blot in addition to the 51 and 61 that would blot when facing the 5 anchor.

Messages In This Thread

• 3a6a cube decision
  Chuck Bower -- Monday, 2 March 2015, at 11:10 p.m.
  • 3a6a cube decision
    Stick -- Monday, 2 March 2015, at 11:22 p.m.
    • 3a6a cube decision
      Keene -- Monday, 2 March 2015, at 11:25 p.m.
      • 3a6a cube decision
        Stick -- Monday, 2 March 2015, at 11:40 p.m.
        • 3a6a cube decision
          Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 3 March 2015, at 2:30 a.m.
          • 3a6a cube decision
            Stick -- Tuesday, 3 March 2015, at 2:55 a.m.
            • 3a6a cube decision
              Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 3 March 2015, at 5:10 a.m.
        • 3a6a cube decision
          neilkaz -- Tuesday, 3 March 2015, at 4:12 a.m.
          • 3a6a cube decision
            Casper Van der Tak -- Tuesday, 3 March 2015, at 9:56 a.m.
  • 3a6a cube decision --- RO
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 4 March 2015, at 1:59 a.m.
    • 3a6a cube decision --- variant 1
      Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 4 March 2015, at 2:00 a.m.
      • 3a6a cube decision --- variant 2
        Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 4 March 2015, at 2:01 a.m.
        • 3a6a cube decision --- variant 3
          Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 4 March 2015, at 2:02 a.m.
          • 3a6a cube decision --- variant 4
            Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 4 March 2015, at 2:03 a.m.