BGonline.org Forums

No QF Here

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Monday, 21 September 2015, at 8:43 p.m.

In Response To: No QF Here (neilkaz)

I did not consider "conceding" as you have. Neither did I evaluate the chance to lose a backgammon. I sort of figured the gammon risk was high, but I thought Blue was already losing a ton of gammons, so why not go for it.

Your play makes sense. This may already be a lost cause.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

• No QF Here
  Stick -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 3:34 a.m.
  • No QF Here
    Taper_Mike -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 5:51 a.m.
  • No QF Here
    scotty -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 7:08 a.m.
  • No QF Here
    ah_clem -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 2:15 p.m.
  • No QF Here
    neilkaz -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 6:10 p.m.
    • No QF Here
      Taper_Mike -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 8:43 p.m.
  • No QF Here
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 21 September 2015, at 6:27 p.m.
  • No QF Here - Rollout
    Stick -- Tuesday, 22 September 2015, at 6:55 p.m.
    • Variants (free of QF)
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 22 September 2015, at 11:08 p.m.