BGonline.org Forums

Go for a second checker?

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 23 November 2015, at 3:18 p.m.

In Response To: Go for a second checker? (Taper_Mike)

Taper_Mike wrote:

It would be interesting to see how this position changes when you remove another checker or three from White’s side of the board.

I have a better variant than that, which I will post soon.

Messages In This Thread

• Go for a second checker?
  Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 22 November 2015, at 10:39 p.m.
  • Go for a second checker?
    Stick -- Sunday, 22 November 2015, at 10:55 p.m.
  • Go for a second checker?
    neilkaz -- Monday, 23 November 2015, at 7:01 a.m.
  • Go for a second checker?
    Taper_Mike -- Monday, 23 November 2015, at 8:05 a.m.
    • Go for a second checker?
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 November 2015, at 3:18 p.m.
      • Go for a second checker?
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 23 November 2015, at 7:32 p.m.
  • Rollout and variant
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 November 2015, at 10:36 p.m.
    • Cusp Variants
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 24 November 2015, at 7:12 a.m.