[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

OLM 20160320A The Dilly Builders Consultation

Posted By: ah_clem
Date: Monday, 21 March 2016, at 3:05 p.m.

In Response To: OLM 20160320A The Dilly Builders Consultation (Jason Lee)

I don't like 20/16. AtS we need to avoid a gammon and strewing three blots around seems too loose. Granted they have a man on the roof and no board, but I still like keeping the GP.

8/4 is safe, but misplaces the checker.

Hitting loose on the two was my choice, but due to trying to play along on a phone where I couldn't see the diagram while posting I muffed the play and voted or an illegal move. Agree that it buries a checker, and blitzing is not indicated by the score or the lack of material (only 8 in the zone), but I think it's sound even if it's not best. Maybe we should just own this play and take our lumps since a majority meant to vote for it.

13/9 is looking better now that I've read some of the arguments. Eleven in the zone with spares on the 6, 8, and 9 mean we're poised to make a strong blockade or blitz. It retains the anchor in case things go south and only leaves seven return hits on the midpoint (loose hits on the 21 don't concern me, and 22 will be good for them no matter what we play). I'll now vote for that, recognizing that it's the Captain's decision, not majority rule now.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.