BGonline.org Forums

Variable MET design

Posted By: Albert Steg
Date: Wednesday, 13 February 2019, at 2:26 p.m.

In Response To: Variable MET design (Ian Dunstan)

For a made-up example: I might do numerous rollouts with XGR++ and find that the underlying g+bg percentage for money is (say) 28.5%.

Is 28.5% the percentage of money ('unlimited') games you would expect to end in a gammon or backgammon for either player, without the Jacoby rule in effect?

What % of gammons do people suspect are prevented by the Jacoby rule? In other words, what % of games in actual traditional money play with Jacoby in effect end in a g/bg one way or the other?

Do we know what % of Crawford/2-away games end in a gammon for the trailer? Would it be around 15%?

I feel like this has come up before but I forgot the conclusion. Sorry if I'm running over old ground.

Albert

Messages In This Thread

• Variable MET design
  Ian Dunstan -- Wednesday, 13 February 2019, at 11:03 a.m.
  • Variable MET design
    Albert Steg -- Wednesday, 13 February 2019, at 2:26 p.m.
    • Variable MET design
      roadkillbooks -- Thursday, 14 February 2019, at 2:01 a.m.
      • Variable MET design
        Florin Popa -- Thursday, 14 February 2019, at 11:26 a.m.
    • Variable MET design
      Ian Dunstan -- Thursday, 14 February 2019, at 10:20 a.m.
      • Variable MET design
        Albert Steg -- Thursday, 14 February 2019, at 4:06 p.m.
        • Variable MET design
          Ian Dunstan -- Friday, 15 February 2019, at 7:33 a.m.
          • Variable MET design
            Ian Dunstan -- Friday, 15 February 2019, at 7:39 a.m.
  • Variable MET design
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 14 February 2019, at 4:51 p.m.
    • Variable MET design
      Ian Dunstan -- Friday, 15 February 2019, at 6:27 a.m.
  • Input g+bg for imitating G11 MET
    Ian Dunstan -- Saturday, 16 February 2019, at 7:33 a.m.
  • Version 0.1
    Ian Dunstan -- Sunday, 17 February 2019, at 6:37 a.m.