BGonline.org Forums

41S-21 RO

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 5:12 a.m.

In Response To: 41S-21 RO (Nack Ballard)

I don't think we need to extend this further. I'll have to take a closer look at this to see if it tells us anything about GNU's questionable slotting preferences.

Thanks Stick.

Messages In This Thread

• Ask First
  David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 6:10 p.m.
  • Ask First
    Stick -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 8:57 p.m.
    • Ask First
      David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 10:02 p.m.
  • Ask First
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 9:48 p.m.
    • Ask First
      David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 10:01 p.m.
  • 41S-21 RO
    Stick -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 3:27 a.m.
    • 41S-21 RO
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 3:49 a.m.
      • 41S-21 RO
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 5:12 a.m.
      • 41S-21 RO..I remain suprised that this is clear while 51S 21 is close
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 1:03 p.m.
        • 41S-21 and 51S-21: merits of $ vs S
          Nack Ballard -- Friday, 1 January 2010, at 3:39 a.m.
      • 41S-21 RO
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 4:40 p.m.
        • 41S-21 RO
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 10:33 p.m.
          • 41S-21 RO
            neilkaz -- Friday, 1 January 2010, at 5:23 a.m.
        • 41S-21 — Clarifying Snowie nacbracs...
          Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 7 April 2012, at 5:54 a.m.
          • 41S-21 — Clarifying Snowie nacbracs...
            Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 7 April 2012, at 1:24 p.m.