BGonline.org Forums

How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Monday, 11 January 2010, at 9:06 a.m.

In Response To: How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head? (eXtreme Gammon)

It wouldn't take an extremely long time to do 300,000 games of XG 3-ply vs. GNU 2-ply or something similar.

I'll leave it to math people to figure out VR stuff.

Messages In This Thread

• How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
  Ian Shaw -- Friday, 8 January 2010, at 4:23 p.m.
  • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 8 January 2010, at 10:18 p.m.
    • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
      Bob Koca -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 6:45 p.m.
  • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
    eXtreme Gammon -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 7:58 p.m.
    • Follow up for match play
      eXtreme Gammon -- Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 8:08 p.m.
    • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 12:49 a.m.
      • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
        eXtreme Gammon -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 1:02 a.m.
        • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
          Bob Koca -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 1:06 a.m.
    • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 9:06 a.m.
    • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
      Rich Munitz -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 2:29 p.m.
  • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
    Ian Shaw -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 2:04 p.m.
    • How to design a statisctally significant bot head-to-head?
      Maik Stiebler -- Monday, 11 January 2010, at 4:08 p.m.