| |
BGonline.org Forums
Live variance reduction tournament
Posted By: Johan Segers In Response To: Live variance reduction tournament (Timothy Chow)
Date: Tuesday, 6 September 2011, at 6:41 p.m.
Thanks for the link! Being a probabilist myself, I greatly appreciate the poem.
Back to the issue itself: in my opinion, the main objection against using error rate as the criterion is that it takes away all interaction between the players. In an error rate tournament, I doesn't make a difference for me if I have to play a perfect opponent or an absolute beginner. In fact, in an error rate tournament it would be conceptually equivalent (and much more practical) to have everybody play a bot right away...
In a variance reduction tournament, however, if my opponent is a beginner, I hopefully win the match and so I earn points (100 percent for the victory minus my luck rate), even if I don't play perfectly. In this way, what I earn is not equal to my performance measured relative to a perfect opponent (which is in some sense what the error rate is), but my performance relative to my particular opponent at that moment. In this way, the match becomes a real fight between me and my opponent.
Does that make any sense?
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.