BGonline.org Forums

52S-xxx-62

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 4:48 p.m.

In Response To: 52S-xxx-62 (David Rockwell)

I think David's plays are either best or close except for one. His Nactations are perfect: S = Split (22/16 13/11), s = split (24/18 13/11), Z = reverse split (24/22 13/7), R = Run (22/14), r = run (24/16).

From what I recollect of Snowie truncs of 52S-xxx-62, one should play Z against Opp's so-so priming point (64P, 42P, 22E, 22N or 44B) but play the connectively running "r" against a strong priming point (61P, 31P, or 11E). I think the position with the 31P reply was unclear, though.

Non-pointmakers: Against 41T, 51S, 52S or 65R, play aggressively with S. Against 32Z fall back on R, against 62R fall back on r, and against 63R fall back to Z, so as not to expose one or both outfield blots to a new direct shot.

Those two paragraphs cover fifteen replies (Dmitriy's eight plus seven more, admittedly not all of which are good on White's part). Let's see, though, what his modern rollouts reveal.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 52S-xxx-62
  Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 8:47 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 1:52 a.m.
    • 52S-xxx-62
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 4:48 p.m.
      • 52S-xxx-62
        Tommy Nesbakk -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 7:48 a.m.
        • 52S-xxx-62
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 12:33 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 10:41 a.m.
  • I remember...
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 12:42 a.m.
    • I remember...
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 3:34 p.m.
  • 52S-xxx-62 ***RO***
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 8:12 a.m.
    • 52S-xxx-62, Summary
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 2:30 p.m.
      • 52S-52S-62 ***RO***
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Saturday, 19 November 2011, at 7:38 p.m.