BGonline.org Forums

61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 8:42 p.m.

In Response To: 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32 (Nack Ballard)

Oops! In summary: 6W&-32H; 61W-32$, 61&-32$, 63&-32$.

Messages In This Thread

• DMP 63W-32?
  Ian Shaw -- Tuesday, 3 January 2012, at 3:55 p.m.
  • DMP 63W-32?
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 3 January 2012, at 4:23 p.m.
  • 63W-32-d
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 1:41 a.m.
    • 63W-32-d Rollout
      Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 2:36 p.m.
      • 63W-32-d Rollout
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 8:50 p.m.
    • 63W-32-d --- XG rollout
      Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 6:41 a.m.
  • 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 2:11 a.m.
    • 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32
      Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 1:13 p.m.
      • 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 8:17 p.m.
        • 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32
          Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 4 January 2012, at 8:42 p.m.
    • 63&-32, rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 3:10 a.m.
    • 61&-32, rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 3:17 a.m.
    • 63W-32, rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 5:27 a.m.
    • 61W-32, rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 6:20 a.m.
    • 61&-32, 63&-32, 61W-32, 63W-32: Data summary
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 6:42 a.m.
      • Additional data
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 7:13 a.m.
      • Methinks Nack meant W = Wild (24/21 6/4).
        Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 12 January 2012, at 7:26 a.m.