BGonline.org Forums
looking for explenations for top 5 plays
Posted By: Martin Sterel
Date: Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 6:20 p.m.
In Response To: variance of example 3-13. (Martin Sterel)
Although I have hoped I formulated it clear.
I am looking for answers why the top 2 plays seem to conflict .In light of the theme ( connectivity) even though I realise all to well the position has changed. Still the connecting play as in 3-13 is still in top … ( as I do not want to give it away ) 5.
Messages In This Thread
- variance of example 3-13.
Martin Sterel -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 1:04 p.m.
- looking for explenations for top 5 plays
Martin Sterel -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 6:20 p.m.
- 61P-66O-65D-32 and variant
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 1:10 a.m.
- RO
Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:14 a.m.
- RO ps
Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 6:32 a.m.
- RO
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 7:23 a.m.
- RO
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 7:33 a.m.
- RO
Martin Sterel -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 8:00 a.m.
- 61P-66O-65D-32 -- 5k rollout of UW
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 20 January 2012, at 4:27 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.