BGonline.org Forums

Cube PR Vs. Checker PR

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Sunday, 5 May 2013, at 4:10 a.m.

In Response To: Cube PR Vs. Checker PR (Joe Russell)

PR is a highly ad hoc construct anyway if you look closely at how the sausage is made, so "theoretical PR" seems like a misnomer to me. I'd agree with David Rockwell that there's no reason to tinker with PR ("the nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from"), but it's not because there's anything magic about the current definition.

Messages In This Thread

• Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
  Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 2:52 p.m.
  • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:16 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:50 p.m.
      • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
        Bob Koca -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 6:25 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      ah_clem -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:55 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      David Rockwell -- Friday, 3 May 2013, at 1:00 a.m.
  • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
    rew -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:41 p.m.
  • Rating of bot that didn't cube
    Rod -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 5:25 p.m.
  • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
    Joe Russell -- Saturday, 4 May 2013, at 9:06 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 5 May 2013, at 4:10 a.m.