| |
BGonline.org Forums
Effective errors and marginal doubles
Posted By: Florin Popa In Response To: Effective errors and marginal doubles (Bob Koca)
Date: Sunday, 25 September 2016, at 1:41 a.m.
I agree PR shouldn't because is designed to measure the level of play not considering the opponent. Comparing the MWC lost you can see in part the interaction but I would like to see at least here consecutive missed doubles calculated differently because the impact on the result is clearly not the sum, not independent errors.
An idea can be to increment the MWC lost only when a transition from the current state occurs, if not (luck is 0 in case of repeating position) the max is calculated. In the end in the real game I think we can say that doubling properly is an opportunity to increase your chances and not that you lose something not doing it as the XG model is implemented. Players would like to know why they lost, maybe other improvements can be done, luck cost to consider the cube value for example.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.