[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Cube error rates

Posted By: Joe Russell
Date: Wednesday, 22 July 2009, at 1:41 p.m.

In Response To: Cube error rates (Gregg Cattanach)

The static position example was given to make it easier to comprehend. The missed-double errors do not have to be of the same size or on consecutive rolls, just occur in the same state of the cube. You should only be penalized for the largest error.

Let me give an example of why I think the current grading technique is inaccurate. If you miss a cube by .05 and three shakes later you miss a cube by .15. Should you be graded on your largest error or the cumulative error? I think it should be the largest error. Why? Because the difference in MWC between someone that doubled correctly the first time and someone that missed both cubes is .15, the larger error, not .2 the cumulative error. Again, the difference in MWC in this case between perfect play, according to the bot, and two missed cubes is the larger of the errors, not the cumulative error.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.