BGonline.org Forums

Instead of a Calcutta

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 1:12 a.m.

In Response To: Instead of a Calcutta (Phil Simborg)

This system isn't making sense to me. What comprises the total pool and why should Bill who possibly placed no bets get half of it? From the better's standpoint it is a 50% rake but going not to the organizers but instead to the prize fund. Is that correct?

Messages In This Thread

• Instead of a Calcutta
  Phil Simborg -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 12:53 p.m.
  • Instead of a Calcutta
    Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 2:24 p.m.
  • Calcutta = waste of time
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 2:45 p.m.
    • Calcutta = waste of time
      Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 5:24 p.m.
  • Instead of a Calcutta
    Chris Knapp -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 3:38 p.m.
    • Instead of a Calcutta
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 4:35 p.m.
    • Instead of a Calcutta
      Phil Simborg -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 7:55 p.m.
      • Instead of a Calcutta
        Keene -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 8:23 p.m.
      • Instead of a Calcutta
        Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 1:12 a.m.
        • Instead of a Calcutta
          Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 3:27 a.m.
  • What a crazy betting name for a crazy betting game....
    Chiva Tafazzoli -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 4:27 p.m.
    • What a crazy betting name for a crazy betting game....
      TarHeelFan -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 7:19 p.m.
      • What a crazy betting name for a crazy betting game....
        Chiva Tafazzoli -- Tuesday, 8 September 2009, at 10:47 p.m.
      • What a crazy betting name for a crazy betting game....
        Wayne -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 12:16 a.m.
        • From the unquestionable authority...
          Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 4:21 p.m.