| |
BGonline.org Forums
procedure comment second
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: Test OLM Wed 2009-12-09 (Jason Lee)
Date: Thursday, 10 December 2009, at 2:14 p.m.
Regarding handling cube turning decisions:
One option (assuming you don't mind seeing bot opinions) is to open a vote within an emg or MWC threshold. The problem here is that we might stop more often than is interesting. You could also do it Stick's way -- deciding yourself if it's worth considering independent of bot opinion.
There might also be a way of backing up -- i.e. you list the plays between stops and voters can then comment on earlier positions while they make their play decision on the position at hand. (Downside is that you can get some non-objective decisions -- negating good/bad rolls and/or also seeing how a position is likely to develop, then realizing there were enough market losers that you should have doubled).
As always I prefer the more objective and fair methods (e.g. threshold method). You could use some editorial freedom and not stop on a close position if it is similar enough (fuzzy condition, I realize) to a position which was just voted down as being a double.
Not one of the easier things when you do the match the way Stick has compared to the way Kit does it.
BTW, you didn't tell us the rolls that led up to today's vote, or were we supposed to figure that out easily. (I didn't try the latter.)
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.