BGonline.org Forums

rollout, not that i agree

Posted By: Adam Versaw
Date: Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:08 p.m.

In Response To: 44 to play vs potential backgame (Adam Versaw)

I think 5pt is clearly right. The 2 pt is way too deep. Plan is to prime and destroy opponents timing. Slotting and recycling on the way.

The score (after 2 games) is: TheProdigy 4, adamV 2 (match to 7 points)

Move number 7: TheProdigy to play 44

TheProdigy	143
adamV	202
Position ID: 4Dk4gDWYT+IFBA Match ID: MAHyAEAAEAAA

1. Rollout 14/10 13/9 6/2*(2) MWC: 70.19%

0.549 0.299 0.047 - 0.451 0.059 0.002 CL 70.19%

[0.001 0.001 0.001 - 0.001 0.001 0.000 CL 0.03%]

2. Rollout 13/9(2) 6/2*(2) MWC: 70.18% ( -0.01%)

0.546 0.302 0.048 - 0.454 0.059 0.002 CL 70.18%

[0.001 0.001 0.001 - 0.001 0.001 0.000 CL 0.03%]

3. Rollout 13/5(2) MWC: 70.06% ( -0.13%)

0.552 0.297 0.046 - 0.448 0.077 0.003 CL 70.06%

[0.001 0.001 0.001 - 0.001 0.001 0.000 CL 0.03%]

Truncated cubeless rollout (depth 11) (trunc. at one-sided bearoff) with var.redn.

1296 games, Mersenne Twister dice gen. with seed 839330544 and quasi-random dice

Play: world class 2-ply cubeful prune [world class]

keep the first 0 0-ply moves and up to 8 more moves within equity 0.16

Skip pruning for 1-ply moves.

Cube: 2-ply cubeful prune [world class]

Messages In This Thread

• 44 to play vs potential backgame
  Adam Versaw -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
  • 44 to play vs potential backgame
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 1:21 a.m.
  • 44 to play vs potential backgame
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 1:28 a.m.
  • 44 to play vs potential backgame
    John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:00 a.m.
  • 44 to play vs potential backgame
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 4:32 a.m.
  • 44 to play vs potential backgame
    Keene -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 4:43 a.m.
  • rollout, not that i agree
    Adam Versaw -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:08 p.m.
    • rollout, not that i agree
      Stick -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:16 p.m.
      • rollout, not that i agree
        Leonardo Jerkovic -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:29 p.m.
        • rollout, not that i agree
          Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 7:57 p.m.
    • rollout, not that i agree
      Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 6:20 p.m.
    • rollout, not that i agree
      neilkaz -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 6:45 p.m.
      • rollout, not that i agree
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 7:48 p.m.
  • Since you don't seem to mind points 6 apart...
    Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 3:15 p.m.
    • Directed at MCG, but all opinionators welcome *NM*
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 3:16 p.m.
    • Since you don't seem to mind points 6 apart...
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 8:19 p.m.