| |
BGonline.org Forums
Clock policies -- terms
Posted By: Tom Keith In Response To: Clock policies -- terms (Nack Ballard)
Date: Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 2:06 a.m.
Nack,
You've laid out very nicely the reasons for confusion with the current terminology. I agree when I saw "insistable," I knew immediately what it meant. (Neil's suggestion.) To me, "enforceable" isn't quite as good because it suggests something a TD might be doing.
Is it possible to create single-word terms that are free of confusion? I don't know, but it is fun to try! Here are my suggestions:
1. Clocks allowed.
2. Clocks insistable.
3. Clocks required. ("Mandatory" is fine too; "required" seems less harsh.)
Tom
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.