BGonline.org Forums

ironically...

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 6:54 p.m.

In Response To: Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception (Phil Simborg)

The backgammon boom of the 1970's was coincident with promotional books and articles that portrayed and emphasized backgammon as a money game. (See magazine articles from the time, such as those in the March 1973 issue of Playboy.)

This might be sociological. That was also the decade where pot smoking was effectively decriminalized (i.e. was not prosecuted and therefore permitted) in much of the U.S.

I better stop there before I get accused of posting banned political material. :)

Messages In This Thread

• Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
  Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:24 p.m.
  • Touché! *NM*
    higonefive -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:45 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 4:46 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 5:14 p.m.
  • ironically...
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 6:54 p.m.
  • An Interesting Question and Answer
    Michael Petch -- Wednesday, 2 February 2011, at 11:46 p.m.
    • An Interesting Question and Answer - From Phil's site
      Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 12:14 a.m.
      • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:02 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          Michael Petch -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:34 a.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:03 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing? Answer: More local clubs are needed.
          Ken Larsen -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:01 a.m.
        • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
          misja -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 1:07 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:11 p.m.
            • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
              Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 2:36 p.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Bill Riles -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:04 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:35 p.m.
                  • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                    Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
                    • +1 +1 and +1
                      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:43 p.m.
                • +1 *NM*
                  Justin N. -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 12:47 a.m.
              • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:58 p.m.
                • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
                  Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
          • Why isn't Backgammon growing?
            jdg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 6:00 p.m.
  • Backgammon and Gambling IS NOT the public perception
    Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 8:16 p.m.