[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Nactation notes — S as a substitute for Z

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Monday, 23 January 2012, at 4:29 a.m.

In Response To: Nactation notes — S as a substitute for Z (Taper_Mike)

The way things stand now, a nactator who identifies a play in the Z (Reverse split) family is obligated to evaluate a second family, the S (Split) family, before he can assign a Nactation.

Not true! See below.

The position in this thread is a great example. I made the mistake of assigning 51Z, when I indented to follow the present standard, and assign 51S.

You seem to be laboring under a false premise. Your assignment of 51Z to 23/22 13/8 is not a mistake. It is a perfectly acceptable option.

That said, if you use 21Z, 41Z and 51Z on the opening play or reply, I believe many people will feel disoriented or won't like it. (If that surprises you, feel free to test it out.) Admittedly, it's not so much that they are in love with the convenience clause or even that S is the first letter in Split (although I'm pretty sure that's part of it for some people); rather, it is that they have become accustomed to seeing opening 21S, 41S and 51S written that way and see no good reason to change.

If, OTOH, you use 51Z on a play deeper into the sequence that isn't precisely 24/23 13/8, people are much less likely to care.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.