|
BGonline.org Forums
64S - 31?
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: 64S - 31? (christian munk-christensen)
Date: Sunday, 12 January 2014, at 5:02 p.m.
It's hard to argue with a RO of this length and strength even though after 62K it it's only 90% statistically significant.
Note the differences between 64S and 63S. 64S plays better when not hit.
White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 157Unlimited Game
Jacoby Beaverpip: 167
score: 0
Blue is Player 1XGID=-a----EaC---dE--ac-e----B-:0:0:1:13:0:0:3:0:10 Blue to play 13
1. Book1 24/21 8/7* eq: -0.1066
Player:
Opponent:47.64% (G:12.94% B:0.60%)
52.36% (G:15.39% B:0.74%)Conf.: ±0.0019 (-0.1085...-0.1047) - [89.6%] 2. Book1 8/5 6/5 eq: -0.1083 (-0.0016)
Player:
Opponent:47.18% (G:12.89% B:0.51%)
52.82% (G:13.89% B:0.64%)Conf.: ±0.0017 (-0.1100...-0.1065) - [10.4%] 1 Generated by David Rockwell on 8/24/2013 using eXtreme Gammon 2.10
62208 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Dice Seed: 97513199
Moves and cube decisions: 4-plyeXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.