BGonline.org Forums
Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 2:44 a.m.
In Response To: Running would have been better on the 2nd roll. (Timothy Chow)
This fact that our back checkers are split and having 6 more pips in the race also matter. I, too, make my 4 pt now.
Messages In This Thread
- Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 12:01 a.m.
- 51S-62S-42 and variant
Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 12:59 a.m.
- Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 1:46 a.m.
- Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
neilkaz -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 2:44 a.m.
- Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
Igor -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 3:34 p.m.
- 51S-62S-42 and Variants – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
Taper_Mike -- Monday, 16 June 2014, at 1:07 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.