[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

OLM 20150405A The Prime Factors -- CONSULTATION

Posted By: Casper Van der Tak
Date: Monday, 6 April 2015, at 1:17 a.m.

In Response To: OLM 20150405A The Prime Factors -- CONSULTATION (Jason Lee)

I am sticking with my original play, 8/4*(2) 7/3(2).

Compared to 8/4*(2) 5/1(2), it makes the much better quality board and the better prime. So the play should be better than the other play that makes a 4-board.

Among the plays that make a 3-point board (only), I believe 8/4(3) 15/11 is best, leaving a limited number of shots from the bar, most of which are hits inside. Compared to 22/18, it avoids the 33 disaster reply. So for the purpose of comparison, let me put 8/4*(2) 7/3(2) again 8/4*(3) 15/11.

8/4*(2) 7/3(2) leaves the same number of returns: 11, 13, 15, 16, 22, 23, 25 and 26 (14) against 11, 12, 13, 15, 22, 23, 25 and 35 (14). But it leaves more blots, and the 16, 26 and 25 hits are quite strong. However, we'd buy for that 7 more dancing numbers, and a much better follow up, with good possibilities to extend to a 5 prime.

So 8/4*(2) 7/3(2). And it does not look very close.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.