|
BGonline.org Forums
OLM 20160116A The Prime Factors
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: OLM 20160116A The Prime Factors (Jason Lee)
Date: Saturday, 16 January 2016, at 5:29 p.m.
Pretty sure 21/18(2) is the start of every palatable candidate. (Note the impending timing battle.)
21/15(2) is worth a look. Maybe best for timing while staring down opp's deepest point. However it makes some small numbers play awkwardly next turn and leaves the back checker likely needing future safetying.
21/18(3) 6/3 shares the problem of awkward small numbers. I feel we need to get a checker off the midpoint.
21/18(3), 13/10 gives Dillies a few nice shots but at least erases the future concern of our backmost checker.
21/18(2), 13/10(2) makes a point we will want to break soon and doesn't seem all that flexible (e.g. stripped mid-) anyway.
21/18(2), 13/7 is quite flexible and with Dillie's blotted 2-point doesn't look dangerous this turn, although it might turn into a problem soon.
I like the plays with the most diversity (either 13/7, or 13/10) and I prefer the one that doesn't leave the potential future problem:
21/18(3), 13/10
P.S. Not only do I expect a consultation but in fact am hoping for one, as I'm most concerned about 18(2), 10(2) winning the vote.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.