[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Would the advocates for the new rule state how they would rule Ken's two examples?

Posted By: Barry Silliman
Date: Thursday, 9 February 2017, at 3:54 a.m.

In Response To: USBGF rule for dice-on-checkers - opinion of Ken Larsen (Ken Larsen)

I am not 100% sure on either one. I'd be inclined to say the first example is cocked, and the second example is valid. But it just feels too subjective for comfort.

I suspect that if the new rule were stated such that dice flat on checkers could have no contact with the wall, then almost all ambiguities would be eliminated. It seems like the combination of on top of checkers and contact with walls is where most of the uncertainty lies.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.