[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Slight correction

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Friday, 23 April 2010, at 4:15 a.m.

In Response To: 61P-31P-21 and 61P-61P-21, comparing P to $ (Nack Ballard)

The caption of the first diagram of my previous post states "P is best; $ is a blunder." This should read "$ is a blunder; P is about .06 better."

For 61P-31P-21, P and three other plays are all very close in value, with P probably in second. The purpose of the post is to compare P and $ (the distant fifth best play), so in that sense it doesn't matter. I just wanted to clarify here that the statement "P is best" is sloppy or misleading, though P may be tied for best.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.