BGonline.org Forums
Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 2:25 a.m.
In Response To: Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations (Tom Keith)
There are numerous examples where 4a2a makes a less aggressive play than would be made at GG because of undoubled gammon losses. Without checking my data, I believe that 41S-63 and 64S-33 are both on list. I'm sure there are others.
Messages In This Thread
- Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Rick Janowski -- Wednesday, 15 May 2013, at 4:57 p.m.
- Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 15 May 2013, at 5:43 p.m.
- Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Tom Keith -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 12:52 a.m.
- Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 2:14 a.m.
- Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Douglas Zare -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 9:09 p.m.
- GG/GS versus GG+/GS+
David Levy -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 9:14 p.m.
- Example of play prediction method
Rick Janowski -- Friday, 17 May 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
- When GG and GG+ diverge: 62s 66
Jeremy Bagai -- Saturday, 18 May 2013, at 2:59 a.m.
- Gammon Go (GG) and Gammon Save (GS) Considerations
Phil Simborg -- Saturday, 18 May 2013, at 6:24 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.